Shopify/go-lua
{ "createdAt": "2013-12-20T17:29:43Z", "defaultBranch": "main", "description": "A Lua VM in Go", "fullName": "Shopify/go-lua", "homepage": null, "language": "Go", "name": "go-lua", "pushedAt": "2025-07-18T18:33:21Z", "stargazersCount": 3364, "topics": [], "updatedAt": "2025-11-24T07:46:31Z", "url": "https://github.com/Shopify/go-lua"}A Lua VM in pure Go
Section titled “A Lua VM in pure Go”go-lua is a port of the Lua 5.2 VM to pure Go. It is compatible with binary files dumped by luac, from the Lua reference implementation.
The motivation is to enable simple scripting of Go applications. For example, it is used to describe flows in Shopify’s load generation tool, Genghis.
go-lua is intended to be used as a Go package. It does not include a command to run the interpreter. To start using the library, run:
go get github.com/Shopify/go-luaTo develop & test go-lua, you’ll also need the lua-tests submodule checked out:
git submodule update --initYou can then develop with the usual Go commands, e.g.:
go buildgo test -coverA simple example that loads & runs a Lua script is:
package main
import "github.com/Shopify/go-lua"
func main() { l := lua.NewState() lua.OpenLibraries(l) if err := lua.DoFile(l, "hello.lua"); err != nil { panic(err) }}Status
Section titled “Status”go-lua has been used in production in Shopify’s load generation tool, Genghis, since May 2014, and is also part of Shopify’s resiliency tooling.
The core VM and compiler has been ported and tested. The compiler is able to correctly process all Lua source files from the Lua test suite. The VM has been tested to correctly execute over a third of the Lua test cases.
Most core Lua libraries are at least partially implemented. Prominent exceptions are regular expressions, coroutines and string.dump.
Weak reference tables are not and will not be supported. go-lua uses the Go heap for Lua objects, and Go does not support weak references.
Benchmarks
Section titled “Benchmarks”Benchmark results shown here are taken from a Mid 2012 MacBook Pro Retina with a 2.6 GHz Core i7 CPU running OS X 10.10.2, go 1.4.2 and Lua 5.2.2.
The Fibonacci function can be written a few different ways to evaluate different performance characteristics of a language interpreter. The simplest way is as a recursive function:
function fib(n) if n == 0 then return 0 elseif n == 1 then return 1 end return fib(n-1) + fib(n-2) endThis exercises the call stack implementation. When computing fib(35), go-lua is about 6x slower than the C Lua interpreter. Gopher-lua is about 20% faster than go-lua. Much of the performance difference between go-lua and gopher-lua comes from the inclusion of debug hooks in go-lua. The remainder is due to the call stack implementation - go-lua heap-allocates Lua stack frames with a separately allocated variant struct, as outlined above. Although it caches recently used stack frames, it is outperformed by the simpler statically allocated call stacks in gopher-lua.
$ time lua fibr.lua real 0m2.807s user 0m2.795s sys 0m0.006s
$ time glua fibr.lua real 0m14.528s user 0m14.513s sys 0m0.031s
$ time go-lua fibr.lua real 0m17.411s user 0m17.514s sys 0m1.287sThe recursive Fibonacci function can be transformed into a tail-recursive variant:
function fibt(n0, n1, c) if c == 0 then return n0 else if c == 1 then return n1 end return fibt(n1, n0+n1, c-1) end
function fib(n) fibt(0, 1, n) endThe Lua interpreter detects and optimizes tail calls. This exhibits similar relative performance between the 3 interpreters, though gopher-lua edges ahead a little due to its simpler stack model and reduced bookkeeping.
$ time lua fibt.lua real 0m0.099s user 0m0.096s sys 0m0.002s
$ time glua fibt.lua real 0m0.489s user 0m0.484s sys 0m0.005s
$ time go-lua fibt.lua real 0m0.607s user 0m0.610s sys 0m0.068sFinally, we can write an explicitly iterative implementation:
function fib(n) if n == 0 then return 0 else if n == 1 then return 1 end local n0, n1 = 0, 1 for i = n, 2, -1 do local tmp = n0 + n1 n0 = n1 n1 = tmp end return n1 endThis exercises more of the bytecode interpreter’s inner loop. Here we see the performance impact of Go’s switch implementation. Both go-lua and gopher-lua are an order of magnitude slower than the C Lua interpreter.
$ time lua fibi.lua real 0m0.023s user 0m0.020s sys 0m0.003s
$ time glua fibi.lua real 0m0.242s user 0m0.235s sys 0m0.005s
$ time go-lua fibi.lua real 0m0.242s user 0m0.240s sys 0m0.028sLicense
Section titled “License”go-lua is licensed under the MIT license.

